Skip navigation

Monthly Archives: October 2009

以下的文章可能會有點像逐字稿, 如果對文字有恐懼的讀者們,可以隨意逛逛就好.

寫這篇的目的只是為了順一下自己的想法, practice make perfect…right? I eagerly hope so…. good luck to myself and god bless.

P1
A1這一組的主題是:健康照護產業服務創新的方法論建構,而在這個A1的分向裡又再細分了三個子項.
就第一個子項,我們做了資料及研究對象的蒐集與界定
第二個和第三個子項,我們以據Kusisto這位學者在2005年時提出的The multinational nature of service innovation 中的六個構面來做進一步的資料蒐集及文獻回顧及方法選擇. 透過資料文獻的匯整及探討,看能否產出新議題,或是對產業的建言.而最終目標即是整合所以健康照護服務的相關方法論.

P2
相關方法論及創新與組織治理的資料與文獻的蒐集,
目前的我們的進度是先從這三塊著手, 接下來我們會繼續從其餘的兩個方向做資料的蒐集與整合.

P3
從技術與服務的部份來看,我們將目前有涉及到照護產業的技術與服務提供的業者,依其提供的產品特性分別歸類為以下幾項.
P4
- 以敏盛醫院來看,它不僅提供了疾病診療,健康照顧,也與合作廠商配合,提供消費者一套完整的健康照護服務.
P5
- 以中興保全為例,他出了一套有系統的居家整合型服務平台Mycasa,比較特別的是照護管家這一塊,透過他們所提供的生理量監測儀器,在家做自行做測量及計錄,透過網路將資訊傳送到平台後面的健康管理師,為使用者做健康管理的規畫與把關.

P6
網絡及價值鏈的佈局
在價值鏈的部份,我們參考了Porter在國家競爭優勢中提及的價值鏈模型,
P7
就此模型,將照謢產業的各個相關服務,就主要活動及支援活動分別歸納於此模型中.
P8
接著,是產業網絡的部份,
就健康照護產業內的角色而言,我們大致上把它分類為四個族群.
-服務的使用者
-照護儀器與設備產業的供應者
-醫療服務的提供者
-健康照護整合管理與服務的提供者

P9
另外,依照每個服務提供者所屬的產業性質不同,畫出一個一個節點,依其點與點之間的有的互動或相關活動(不管是商流,金流,物流或是資訊流)做標明.
這裡舉了兩個不同服務的提供者為例子,一個為中興保全一個為敏盛醫院.

黃色的部份為中興保全自身集團下所屬的支援產業, 黃色的部份為其它外部異業結盟的支援活動,
敏盛醫院也是一樣.
透過主要的活動及支援的活動,產生一系列的於健康照護相關的價值活動.

1. TESOL: Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages
It is particularly useful because dropping the “T” allows for a focus on the language and its learners rather than just the teaching of it.

2. SLA: Second Language Acquisition
Second language acquisition is the process by which people learn a second language in addition to their native language(s). The term second language is used to describe the acquisition of any language after the acquisition of the mother tongue. The language to be learned is often referred to as the “target language” or “L2″, compared to the first language, “L1″, referred to as the “source language”. Second language acquisition may be abbreviated “SLA”, or L2A, for “L2 acquisition”.

Second language acquisition theory seeks to quantify how and by what processes individuals acquire a second language. The predominant theory of second language acquisition was developed by the University of Southern California’s Steven Krashen. Krashen is a specialist in language development and acquisition, and his influential theory is widely accepted in the language learning community.
There are five main components of Krashen’s theory. Each of the components relates to a different aspect of the language learning process. The five components are as follows:
• The Acquisition Learning Hypothesis
• The Monitor Hypothesis
• The Natural Order Hypothesis
• The Input Hypothesis
• The Affective Filter Hypothesis

3. L1: “Language 1″ = the student’s native (primary or first acquired) language.
L2: “Language 2″ = the language being learned or studied.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.